For more information see Financial market participants want more credit ratings
dated May 29, 2017 and Regulation has made ratings more credible in Russia dated June 16, 2016.
The share of financial market participants who trust credit ratings assigned by agencies operating in the Russian market has grown from 56% to 88% over the last year (Fig. 2), including 22% who "trust" and 66% who "probably trust". This is a maximum level of trust over the last two years. The level of trust has increased most in those respondents who uses ratings assigned under both national and international scales.
In general, financiers increasingly apply ratings under the both scales as complementary tools in making investment decisions. Ratings assigned under the both scales have become more in demand in the market (from 58% to 75%, Fig. 1). National ratings have become more popular (11% against 7% last year), unlike international ratings that have lost in popularity among each group of respondents.
ACRA conducted the survey among financial market participants between April 3 and June 22, 2018, interviewing 224 respondents, with 70% of them representing the financial sector, 15% – the corporate sector, 8% – public authorities, 5% – private investors, 3% – other sectors (200 / 154 respondents participated in the 2017 / 2016 surveys).
1 The question was not included in the 2016 survey, therefore, only two last years were compared.
42% of respondents indicated that their trust in the assessments made by rating agencies operating in the Russian market have grown (Fig. 3). For comparison: in 2017, the share of such respondents was 30%, and in 2016 — 8%. The maximum growth has occurred among financial sector players (44%), private investors (40%) and corporates (39%).
July 13, 2017, the transformation period of the Russian rating industry ended. 40% of respondents indicated that the state control tightening has driven up their trust (Fig. 4). Another 36% indicated correct risk assessments as such driver.
Fig. 4 shows the proportion of those who answered the question. Respondents were allowed to tick more than one answer, so that the sum exceeds 100%.
Third year in a row, the participants have been most concerned about the underestimation of credit risk and the belated response (53%) of rating agencies operating in the Russian market (Fig. 5). However, the percentage of participants who responded so in the previous two years was significantly higher (59% in 2017 and 66% in 2016). The second most important event, which aroused concerns in respondents, is lower competition in the Russian market (28%). However, the share of such respondents has decreased over the past year from 30%. In general, this year, survey participants are less frequently respond that the current degree of competition in the market negatively affects the quality of ratings (42% vs 51% a year ago, Fig. 6).
Fig. 5 shows the proportion of those who answered the question. Respondents were allowed to select more than one answer, so that the sum exceeds 100%.
Over the past year, the proportion of respondents who answered that they are satisfied with the degree of rating penetration in the Russian economy has increased from 38% to 46% (Fig. 7). The greatest increase in the degree of satisfaction occurred in those who focus on ratings assigned under the national scale only (from 542% to 65%). Although the overall level of dissatisfaction has decreased over the past year, it still has not reached the 2016 figure.
Most often, the participants indicate a lack of credit ratings in companies operating in the construction and real estate sector (42%), agro-industry (31%), retail sales (27%) and IT and media (27%) (Fig. 8); less often — in the oil and gas industry (8%), telecommunications sector (8%) and chemical industry (11%).
A year ago, participants responded that the reputation in the Russian and global markets is equally important for a rating agency: both criteria scored 4.2 points (Fig. 9). This year, for the first time, the respondents named the reputation in the Russian market as the main criterion used when choosing a rating agency. The indicator scored 4.5 points, while the international reputation scored only 4 points.
The second most important factor is pricing (3.7 points). Its relevance has been growing in the past three years, but, on the other hand, more and more respondents say that the price of credit rating agencies' services is generally available to Russian issuers (79 against 70% a year ago, Fig. 10). The share of respondents who are generally satisfied with the level of information disclosure by rating agencies has also became higher. It has grown from 49% to 82% over the past three years (Fig. 10).
Fig. 9 shows the average score.
In Fig. 10, the share of respondents who believe that the prices offered by rating agencies are generally acceptable for Russian issuers is indicated without those respondents who have no pricing information (see Appendix).
2 The 2016 survey did not feature this question.
3 In the 2016 / 2017 polls, respondents were not allowed to select more than one answer.
4 The figure shows the average score.
5 Options “Credit risk management tools (rating model validation, simulation, stress testing)” and “Indices” appeared in 2018.
You will receive an email with a link to change your password
Полное использование материалов сайта разрешается только с письменного согласия правообладателя, АКРА (АО). Частичное использование материалов сайта (не более 30% текста статьи) разрешается только при условии указания гиперссылки на непосредственный адрес материала на сайте www.acra-ratings.ru . Гиперссылка должна быть размещена в подзаголовке или в первом абзаце материала. Размер шрифта гиперссылки не должен быть меньше шрифта текста используемого материала.